Book Review – “Faith Forward Gospel: 7 Myths That Brought Down the Church-and How We Can Get if Back” by Randy Loubier

clip_image002In the author’s Facebook ad, the author asks us:

“What if we’ve been sharing the Gospel backwards?

Jesus started with GOOD NEWS: “The Kingdom of God is here for anyone who believes.” Not sin, not fear.

Randy Loubier reveals how Jesus invited unbelievers to faith first in *Faith Forward Gospel*.

Rediscover the message that changed the world – and could again. Get your copy today!”

Click the “Shop Now” link and Amazon book offering tells us:

“Most of us were taught to share the gospel by starting with sin and ending with heaven.
But Jesus didn’t.

He started with good news—the Kingdom of God is here, available now, to anyone who believes.”

Since Jesus came to our planet to save his people from their sin, and that Jesus, at the beginning of his ministry began with the message “Repent and believe the gospel” (Mak 1:15), I wanted to find out how the author addressed the issue of sin in his book. So, I bought the book and finally made it all the way through to several appendixes that ‘try’ to ‘prove’ that what he had to tell us in the main part of the book was really true!

In my opinion, the author got off on the wrong foot with his very first myth, “Myth 1: The Problem is Sin” and went downhill from there. In the author’s view, ‘sin’ is not the core problem with the human race, but ‘unbelief’ and ‘pride’. In the author’s own words:

“The Bible informs us that the problem is unbelief. If we don’t believe God is right, best, first, we then turn to pride and/ or disobedience.[i]

That first “myth” is by farther largest section of the book. In the author’s own words again:

“We will take a tour through the Bible, starting with the fall of man and ending with Jesus’ convictions in the New Testament.”

He does exactly that, for about 70 pages, filled with long sections of scripture and a lot of personal experience stories, thus ‘proving’ his point by overwhelming any semi-literate students of the Bible with his ‘clever speech’ .

Myth 1, as well as the remainder of the book is all about the “words” we use when starting a gospel conversation and how we are to never begin with “sin” words because Jesus and the Apostles never did. He focused quite a bit on the use of the Romans Road even calling it one of many “Judaizer like rules” that have been common to evangelism for decades, even disparaging Billy Graham, Ray Comfort and others who dare to talk about sin with unbelievers.

I had more than a few exchanges of comments with the author in which I explained that the issue wasn’t about “words” we begin a gospel conversation with, but about getting to the problem of sin because we need the “good news” precisely because of, and with the “bad news”, not instead of the bad news. That was the content of many, if not most of my comments to the author.

During the difficult and painful reading of the book, I told the author several times exactly where I was in its pages and offered comments, especially when I got to Myth 4 – The Gospel is Unavoidably Offensive, which would jump out at any Bible reader who encounters what the Apostle Paul had to say about the offense of the gospel. Once again, the author’s point was how we present the gospel and with what language we use to start a conversation with an unbeliever.

To date, my last comment to the author was in response to a question the author asked in one of his FB posts, “How much should we talk about sin with unbelievers?”. My response was,

“How much” isn’t the issue. Since the problem of sin is the reason Christ came, it’s the ‘bad news’ that’s the reason for the ‘good news’. NOT discussing the problem of sin is spiritual cowardice. We need to address the issue of sin lovingly and with compassion.

He responded with, I guess Jesus didn’t get that memo.”

At that point I decided I was finished and left one last comment:

“Well Sir, I think I have the answer to my question about how you discuss the issue of sin with unbelievers – you don’t. I’ve read all of your myths and am up to the section about needing a “fresh start” section that call us Pharisees if we speak of sin to unbelievers. You tell us “unbelief” is the problem that leads to sin over and over as if unbelief itself isn’t a sin. All I have said is that we need to get to the issue of sin lovingly and compassionately when we share the good news. You are all about the “words” we use. That’s not the issue, but it’s HOW we use our words. Tone, compassion, and method vary—but the message includes “sin”. In short, sharing the gospel without any mention of sin and repentance is not the gospel preached by Jesus or the apostles. You seem to disagree.”

He left me wondering if he more resembled Joseph Smith, who was supposedly told by “God and Jesus in a vision that the church up until then had it all wrong, or Joel Osteen, who admitted to talk show host Larry King that he didn’t devote much time talking about sin, to believers or unbelievers.


[i] Loubier, Randal. Faith Forward Gospel: 7 Myths That Brought Down the Church-and How We Can Build It Back (p. 51). Kindle Edition

7 responses to “Book Review – “Faith Forward Gospel: 7 Myths That Brought Down the Church-and How We Can Get if Back” by Randy Loubier

  1. I’m sorry you had that experience, Dan. One thing is for sure, he won’t be publishing as many books as John Bunyan had published, or even 1/100th of that many, and probably not 1/1000th of that many. I would continue but you get my idea.
    Thanks for the review. You have saved time for others.

    Like

    • That was his latest book, published this year. The author is now selling a download version from his Web page for half what it was when I purchased it. Amazon prices are still the same. He has another, earlier book (2021) “Sowing in Hard Ground: Evangelizing the Anit-Christian Culture”, with a lot of the same material that has also been discounted. Based on other comments, which were mostly communicating the same thought as mine, there are clearly others who refuse to drink the Kool-Aid.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks for sharing, Dan. I’m glad to hear that others saw the same thing as you did. Discernment seems at an all time low these days and it’s good to hear others are awake.
        God’s blessings…

        Like

        • I tried to get the author to clarify what I thought he was telling hie readers:

          “You tell us that defining ‘sin’ as the central problem that plagues mankind is a “myth”, and that the real problem is “unbelief” and “lack of faith” are the problems, and therefore we aren’t to even talk about ‘sin’ with unbelievers or use the term. Do you deny that? You seem to be telling us to merely talk about the blessings that are found in Christ. Do I read you correctly?”

          He agrees that conviction of sin needs to happen, but that we don’t need to use “sin” terms ourselves, or we will turn off unbelievers, as if using ‘sin’ words is automatically personally convicting unbelievers.

          I remember reading “The Cross and the Switchblade” decades ago and how David Wilkerson just told Nicky Cruz how much God loved him and thought “Wow! I don’t need to even talk about sin!” I was wrong.

          Liked by 1 person

          • If he is worried about turning off unbelievers, then what he is serving up is dangerous. Why would anyone who thinks he isn’t sick need a doctor.
            Thanks for your reply, Dan.

            Like

            • Well, it seems he believes in all the right doctrine/theology, including original sin. That would seem to indicate that his “We’ve been sharing the gospel backwards all along!” mantra had more to do with selling books than anything else. We see it all the time all over social media and YouTube – claims to finally have discovered that everything we thought we knew was wrong. People swallow the clickbait by the thousands.

              Liked by 1 person

              • Indeed, they do, Dan. This will probably be this guy’s last book if he’s trying to make a living by publishing. I guess you never know though.

                Like

Leave a reply to Dan C. Cancel reply