Lies and Pretty Horses

It’s been said that a lie will ride in on the horseback of truth. It won’t charge in, all sweaty and frothing, but it will ride in gently, maybe even prancing a little for you, like in a circus ring, decorated with plumes and feathers; dressed up with a fine saddle and glittering bridle.

1But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction. 2 And many will follow their sensuality, and because of them the way of truth will be blasphemed. 3 And in their greed they will exploit you with false words. Their condemnation from long ago is not idle, and their destruction is not asleep.” 1 Peter 2:1-3

In the above passage, the Apostle Peter tells us that just like false prophets arose from among the children of Israel, false teachers would arise from within the church, secretly bringing in destructive heresies. In order to bring in their heresies, they have to look like us, talk like us, and for all appearances, they are one of us. They’ll use scriptural language and quote the Bible. They’ll smile and nod approvingly at agreed upon truth. Then they’ll slip in the lie. Consider the following example, an actual comment on a blog post:

“I totally agree with you on the point that the Bible has been miraculously preserved!! It is also authoritative to instruct and to convict. But it is not the Word of God. You don’t need to believe it’s the Word of God to hold it as sacred, as I do.”

“This is important for us to understand and accept because it is partly for the infallible claim we have attached to the Bible that makes those who know even a little about its origin disregard everything it says! The Bible doesn’t need us to defend it. God defends it. It is God who has preserved it. But by saying it is the Word of God, when Jesus is the Word of God, we make an idol out of what is sacred.

There are kind words of agreement concerning God’s hand in preserving the Bible through the ages. The Bible is acknowledged to be authoritative and useful for teaching us; and excellent guide for growing as believers.

Then comes the lie. “But it is not the Word of God.” But by saying it is the Word of God, when Jesus is the Word of God, we make an idol out of what is sacred.” The Bible is not the Word of God and if we call the Bible the Word of God we are guilty of idolatry.

Jesus is the Word of God but not the Bible, we are told, and somewhat ‘authoritatively’ at that. It’s not offered as an opinion or theological viewpoint. It’s presented as fact. The Bible is not the Word of God. Period. The Word of God cannot be both Jesus and the Bible. The reasoning is somewhat interesting, I must say, and unique among the large amount of material available attacking the inerrancy of scripture.

Well, in my opinion this particular false teacher could use a bit of mentoring in the art of ‘secretly’ bringing in a destructive heresy. Kind of like an ‘Uncle Screwtape’, if you’re a C.S. Lewis fan. The clever heretics don’t just barge in the front door and announce that the Bible isn’t the Word of God. They use the back door or a side door and cast a smidgen of doubt, they attack it little by little. They’ll suggest something to cause just a tiny bit of doubt and then water the poisonous seed, not from a bucket but a teaspoon. Kind of like the serpent in the Garden who asked the question “Did God really say…..?”

Enough has already been posted here concerning the Bible, its inerrancy, its infallibility, and the importance of holding such beliefs. There’s not much I could to what’s been said.

I just want us to be aware of a universal tactic of false teachers and their lies. The most dangerous ones, in my opinion, rise up from ‘among us’. And they ride ‘pretty horses’.

May God bless all who read this and take it to heart!

7 responses to “Lies and Pretty Horses

  1. When we say things like, May God…reveal the true wolves in our midst, we are appealing to “feeling” and “intuition” as the absolute standard.

    The Bible says that it is the true standard, not our hearts.

    The benefit of having a physical printed document is that we can compare claims against it.

    What’s your standard Ufuomaee? Why should I or anyone listen to your claims? Are you a modern prophet? On who’s authority?

    Alec

    Like

    • Good point; to say the Word is inerrant means one has a standard that is inerrant that measures the Scripture and dictate it is in error…so we must ask then the question you asked concerning authority…

      Like

  2. Ufuomaee,

    I just wanted you to know that I have read your post several times, as I have others. You have some good things to say and I am not going to critique your views. I do have just a couple of things to offer for consideration for all of us. No replies are needed. This is food for thought.

    1. God speaks to us, either directly or indirectly.
    2. The Bible has to be one of the above, God speaking directly or indirectly.
    3. Your opinion is that the Bible is God speaking indirectly to us through imperfect men who penned it, and therefore NOT the word of God.
    4. If this correct so far, then it logically follows that nothing produced by men IS the word of God.
    5. If nothing man had a hand in producing is the Word of God, it follows that if we want the inerrant and infallible Word of God, it must be ‘direct’ communication from God The Father, God The Son, or God The Holy Spirit.
    6. If I am still on track, I still have a personal predicament. You see, even if God speaks directly to me, whatever He says has to be filtered through that which is imperfect and error prone. I call it my ‘sin hangover’. Therefore whatever God says to me is filtered through an imperfect human instrument of one sort or another – heart, soul, mind, etc.
    Therefore, I cannot before final glorification, when we will dwell in God’s very presence and where sin in any form is not permitted. In other words, if God did speak directly to me, there would still be imperfect filters through which it is heard.

    The above is in no way a debate, a challenge, or an accusation of any sort. It is an attempt to understand your opinion and a statement of my own personal predicament if I understand you correctly. The reason for the numbering was to try and put my thoughts in some sort of logical sequence. I have left this debate, at least in this venue. I do have a personal blog called The Battle Cry (http://the battlecry49.com). Some of what I post there is also posted there and we can discuss. I also have an email James is free to send you if you ask him and you can look me up on Facebook.

    Cheers any many blessings to you all!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s