A Statement from the Calvinism Advisory Committee

Southern Baptists are Great Commission people. We are also a doctrinal people, and those doctrinal convictions undergird our Great Commission vision and passion. We are a confessional people, who stand together upon the doctrines most vital to us all, confessed together in The Baptist Faith and Message.

Within this common confession, we sometimes disagree over certain theological issues that should not threaten our Great Commission cooperation. We recognize that significant theological disagreement on such issues has occurred with respect to Calvinism. It is, therefore, our responsibility to come together with open hearts and minds in order to speak truthfully, honestly, and respectfully about these theological and doctrinal issues that concern us, threaten to divide us, and compel us into conversation. Such engagement is appropriate at every level of Southern Baptist life including local congregations, associations, state conventions, and the Southern Baptist Convention.

This spirit of conversation has been the hallmark of the meetings of the Calvinism Advisory Committee. We have spent hours together in fruitful, respectful, and candid conversation. We entered these conversations as brothers and sisters in Christ and as faithful and thankful Southern Baptists. Our purpose was neither to resolve centuries of doctrinal disagreement nor to consume ourselves with doctrinal debate. Our purpose was to suggest a course for moving forward together while taking seriously and representing fairly the theological diversity that exists in and has been the strength of Southern Baptist life.

Four central issues have become clear to us as we have met together. We affirm together that Southern Baptists must stand without apology upon truth; that we do indeed have some challenging but not insurmountable points of tension; that we must work together with trust; and that we must encourage one another to testimony.


The Bible
We affirm that the Holy Scriptures are the inerrant, infallible, and totally trustworthy Word of God and our supreme authority on all matters of truth. We affirm that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is the great theme of all Scripture and that the Bible is sufficient to reveal all we need to know concerning God’s purpose to save sinners.

We deny that any human system of thought or any theological tradition can assume supreme authority or be allowed to supplant dependence upon the Bible and all that it reveals. Neither Calvinism nor non-Calvinism ought to be equated exclusively with sound Southern Baptist doctrine nor be considered inconsistent with it.

The Lostness of Humanity
We affirm that all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God and that the universal condition of humanity is lostness, as every single human being, Jesus alone excepted, is a sinner whose only hope of salvation is the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

We deny that any human being is without need of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ, and we deny any teaching that minimizes the truth about sin and the need of all persons to repent and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.

The Power of the Gospel
We affirm that our Lord is mighty to save and that He saves to the uttermost. We affirm the power of the Gospel to redeem every single human being through the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, whom the Father has now declared to be both Lord and Christ, the Savior of the world.

We deny that the Gospel is without power to save anyone who repents and believes in Jesus Christ. We also deny that the Gospel as revealed in Scripture lacks anything needful for our salvation.

The Offer of the Gospel
We affirm that the Gospel is to be made known freely to all in the good faith offer that if anyone confesses that Jesus Christ is Lord and believes in his heart that God has raised Christ from the dead, he will be saved.

We deny that the Gospel lacks any power to save anyone who believes in Christ and receives Him as Savior and Lord. Anyone who understands the Gospel through the power of the Holy Spirit may, in prayer and petition, trust Christ through repentance and faith, and we should plead with all sinners to do so.

The Exclusivity of the Gospel
We affirm that salvation is found in the name of Christ and in no other name. We affirm that Jesus Christ is the Way, the Truth, and the Life and that no one can come to the Father but by Him. We affirm the exclusivity of the Gospel of Christ as the only message of salvation.

We deny that salvation can come to any sinner by any other gospel, any other system of faith and practice, or by any name other than Jesus Christ.

The Atonement of Jesus Christ
We affirm that the death of Jesus Christ on the cross was both penal and substitutionary and that the atonement He accomplished was sufficient for the sins of the entire world.

We deny that there is anything lacking in the atonement of Christ to provide for the salvation of anyone.

The Reality of Heaven and Hell
We affirm that all who come to Christ by faith will be with Him forever in heaven, which He has prepared for the saints. We affirm that all who reject Christ and do not come to Him by faith will spend eternity in hell, a place of eternal punishment.

We deny that there is any opportunity for salvation after the point of death, when all humanity will face the judgment of God.

The Necessity of Conversion
We affirm that salvation involves the conversion of the sinner, whereby the sinner consciously clings to Christ by faith, repents of sin, believes the promises of the Gospel, and publicly professes faith in Christ. We affirm the necessity of conversion and the truth that conversion involves the will of the believer as well as the will of God.

We deny that salvation comes to anyone who has not experienced conversion. We also deny that salvation comes to any sinner who does not will to believe and receive Christ.

The Great Commission
We affirm the church’s duty to obey Christ by preaching the Gospel to all the nations and by making disciples who obey all that Christ has commanded. We affirm every believer’s responsibility to tell anyone and everyone about Jesus and the responsibility of every congregation to be a sending, going, and giving assembly of believers.

We deny that missions and evangelism can be neglected without denying the power of the Gospel; that any church can be faithful without a missionary urgency; and that any believer can be obedient without telling others about Jesus. We deny that evangelism can exist apart from the call to make disciples. Every sinner should be implored to trust Christ by calling on Him through repentance and faith, and every convert should be discipled toward maturity, commitment to the church, and passion for the lost.


Although we are committed to these central truths, we recognize that within them there are tensions:

  • God desires for all to come to repentance, yet not all do.
  • Humans are ruined by the Fall, yet required to respond in faith.
  • God is sovereign in salvation, yet individuals are still held responsible for their reception or rejection of the Gospel.
  • Southern Baptist identity has often been connected to Calvinism, yet has often significantly modified it.

These are just a few of the dynamics at work in Southern Baptist faith and practice. While these tensions can be a source of frustration, especially when we are uncharitable toward those with whom we disagree, they have also been a great benefit to us, reminding us that God’s ways are higher than ours, that no systematic construct can ever contain the fullness of Scriptural truth, that it is we and not the Bible who are subject to error, that we should approach the Word with both fidelity to the past and readiness for further reformation, and that it is better to live in the tensions of unanswered questions than to ignore or adjust some part of the whole counsel of God.

With a full recognition of the limitless wisdom of God’s Word and the limited wisdom of ourselves, we urge Southern Baptists to grant one another liberty in those areas within The Baptist Faith and Message where differences in interpretation cause us to disagree. For instance,

  • We agree that God loves everyone and desires to save everyone, but we differ as to why only some are ultimately saved.
  • While we all heartily affirm the article on election in The Baptist Faith and Message (Article V), we differ as to whether the response of faith plays a role in one’s election.
  • We agree that the penal and substitutionary death of Christ was sufficient for the sins of the entire world, but we differ as to whether Jesus actually substituted for the sins of all people or only the elect.
  • We agree that the Gospel should be proclaimed to everyone, but we differ as to whether or how every hearer will be enabled to respond.
  • We agree that everyone has inherited Adam’s hopelessly fallen sin nature, but we differ as to whether we also inherit his guilt.
  • We agree that men and women are sinners, but we differ about the effects of sin on the mind and the will.
  • We recognize the differences among us between those who believe that sin nullifies freedom to respond to the Gospel and those who believe that freedom to respond to the Gospel is marred but not nullified.
  • We agree that God is absolutely sovereign in initiating salvation, uniting the believer to Himself, and preserving the believer to the end, but we differ as to how God expresses His sovereignty with respect to human freedom.
  • We agree that the Holy Spirit working through the Gospel enables sinners to be saved, but we differ as to whether this grace is resistible or irresistible.
  • We agree on the necessity of regeneration that results in God-ordained, Christ-centered, Spirit-empowered obedience from the heart, but differ as to whether faith precedes regeneration or regeneration precedes faith.
  • We agree that most Southern Baptists believe that those who die before they are capable of moral action go to heaven through the grace of God and the atonement of Christ, even as they differ as to why this is so.

These differences should spur us to search the Scriptures more dutifully, to engage in lively interaction for mutual sharpening and collective Gospel effectiveness, and to give thanks that what we hold in common far surpasses that on which we disagree. But these particular differences do not constitute a sufficient basis for division and must not be allowed to hamper the truly crucial cooperative effort of taking the Gospel to a waiting world. Southern Baptists who stand on either side of these issues should celebrate the freedom to hold their views with passion while granting others the freedom to do the same.


We affirm that Southern Baptists stand together in a commitment to cooperate in Great Commission ministries. We affirm that, from the very beginning of our denominational life, Calvinists and non­Calvinists have cooperated together. We affirm that these differences should not threaten our eager cooperation in Great Commission ministries.

We deny that the issues now discussed among us should in any way undermine or hamper our work together if we grant one another liberty and extend to one another charity in these differences. Neither those insisting that Calvinism should dominate Southern Baptist identity nor those who call for its elimination should set the course for our life together.

We affirm that The Baptist Faith and Message, as adopted by the Southern Baptist Convention in 2000, stands as a sufficient and truthful statement of those doctrines most certainly held among us. We affirm that this confession of faith is to serve as the doctrinal basis for our cooperation in Great Commission ministry.

We deny that any human statement stands above Holy Scripture as our authority. We also deny that The Baptist Faith and Message is insufficient as the doctrinal basis for our cooperation. Other Baptist Confessions are not to be lenses through which The Baptist Faith and Message is to be read. The Baptist Faith and Message alone is our expression of common belief.

We affirm the responsibility of every Southern Baptist to be a friend to all Southern Baptists, so long as we all stand within The Baptist Faith and Message. We affirm that Southern Baptists must avoid the development of a party spirit amongst us, with friendships and trust extended only to those who are in agreement with us.

We deny that issues related to Calvinism or non-Calvinism should alienate or estrange Southern Baptists from each other. Instead, we will extend to one another the mutual respect befitting the bonds of fellowship that hold us together.

We affirm the responsibility of all Southern Baptists to guard our conversation so that we do not speak untruthfully, irresponsibly, harshly, or unkindly to or about any other Southern Baptist. This negativity is especially prevalent in the use of social media, and we encourage the exercise of much greater care in that context.

We deny that our cooperation can be long sustained if our conversation becomes untruthful, uncharitable, or irresponsible.


We affirm the responsibility and privilege of every Southern Baptist to advocate his or her doctrinal convictions. We affirm that theology should be honored and privileged in our conversations and cooperation. We also affirm that theological and doctrinal debate can be a sign of great health within a denomination that is devoted to truth and is characterized by trust.

We deny that the main purpose of the Southern Baptist Convention is theological debate. We further deny that theological discussion can be healthy if our primary aim is to win an argument, to triumph in a debate, or to draw every denominational meeting into a conversation over conflicted issues. Of more significance to our life together than any allegiance to Calvinism or non-Calvinism should be our shared identity as Southern Baptists.

Most importantly, we affirm together that our testimony to the world must be the message of the Gospel of Jesus Christ—and that Southern Baptists must stand together in the testimony that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. We stand together to declare that salvation comes to all who call upon the name of the Lord, and that God’s desire is for the salvation of sinners and the reaching of the nations.


Where do we go from here? We must celebrate the unity we share together in our common Great Commission purpose, while acknowledging and celebrating variety among us. We must clarify the parameters of our cooperation where necessary but stand together without dispute.

We should be thankful that these are the issues Southern Baptists are now discussing, even as liberal denominations are debating the full abdication of biblical morality and allowing the denial of central doctrines. We are, seen in this light, blessed by the discussions that come to Southern Baptists who want to affirm the fullness of the faith, not its reduction.

We should call upon all Southern Baptists to promote the unity we share within The Baptist Faith and Message and, while recognizing that most Southern Baptists will believe and teach more than what that confession contains, we must never believe or teach less.

We should expect all leaders in the Southern Baptist Convention and all entities serving our denomination to affirm, to respect, and to represent all Southern Baptists of good faith and to serve the great unity of our Convention. No entity should be promoting Calvinism or non-Calvinism to the exclusion of the other. Our entities should be places where any Southern Baptist who stands within the boundaries of The Baptist Faith and Message should be welcomed and affirmed as they have opportunities to benefit from, participate in, and provide leadership for those entities.

In order to prevent the rising incidence of theological conflict in the churches, we should expect all candidates for ministry positions in the local church to be fully candid and forthcoming about all matters of faith and doctrine, even as we call upon pulpit and staff search committees to be fully candid and forthcoming about their congregation and its expectations.

We must do all within our power to avoid the development of partisan divisions among Southern Baptists.

We must not only acknowledge but celebrate the distinctive contributions made by the multiple streams of our Southern Baptist heritage. These streams include both Charleston and Sandy Creek, the Reformers and many of the advocates of the Radical Reformation, confessional evangelicalism and passionate revivalism. These streams and their tributaries nourish us still.

We must also remember that labels, though often necessary, are often misleading and unfair. They must be used with care and assigned with charity. The use of the words “Calvinist” and “Calvinism” can be both revealing and misleading, since individuals may hold to any number of variants on doctrinal points. Similarly non-Calvinists, who may resist even that designation, will cover an even larger landscape of positions. Labels like these often fail us.

We must stand together in rejecting any form of hyper-Calvinism that denies the mandate to present the offer of the Gospel to all sinners or that denies the necessity of a human response to the Gospel that involves the human will. Similarly, we must reject any form of Arminianism that elevates the human will above the divine will or that denies that those who come to faith in Christ are kept by the power of God. How do we know that these positions are to be excluded from our midst? Each includes beliefs that directly deny what The Baptist Faith and Message expressly affirms.

We must remember that the diversity we celebrate is already honored in the names we revere—theological statesmen such as James P. Boyce and B. H. Carroll, E. Y. Mullins and W. T. Conner; missionary heroes and martyrs such as Lottie Moon and Bill Wallace; scholars such as A. T. Robertson and Robert Baker, educators such as Lee Scarborough and John Sampey; evangelists and preachers like George W. Truett and W. A. Criswell, R. G. Lee and Adrian Rogers; and pastor-theologians like Herschel Hobbs. Where would we be today if we attempted to divide these heroes and heroines of the faith by the issue of Calvinism? We would cut ourselves off from our own heritage.

We must also remember that a rising young generation of Southern Baptists is watching and listening, looking to see if this denomination is going to be a bold movement of churches on mission or merely a debating society.

Beyond them stands a world desperately in need of the Gospel. Will we distract ourselves in an unnecessary debate while the world is perishing in need of the Gospel?

If we stand together in truth, we can trust one another in truth, even as we experience tension. We can talk like brothers and sisters in Christ, and we can work urgently and eagerly together.

We have learned that we can have just this kind of conversation together, and we invite all Southern Baptists to join together in this worthy spirit of conversation. But let us not neglect the task we are assigned. The world desperately needs to hear the promise of the Gospel.

Respectfully submitted,
The Calvinism Advisory Committee

Watch a discussion with the Calvnism Advisory Committee at the 2013 Southern Baptist Convention:

Calvinism Advisory Group Unanimously Affirms its EC Advisory Report

For several years, Southern Baptists have been asking important questions about our identity and our future. At times we have struggled with trying to grasp the breadth of our doctrinal and historical differences, particularly related to matters such as Calvinism. What has been needed is a new consensus that will help point us toward a new sense of cooperation and renewal for the sake of the Gospel. It is our hope that Truth, Trust, and Testimony in a Time of Tension, while not a perfect statement, will, nevertheless, provide a significant and positive step in that direction. The statement reflects the efforts of many diverse voices who have attempted to speak as one with a sense of convictional civility and Spirit-enabled charity toward and with one another. We pray that these efforts will enable us to serve collaboratively and work faithfully, while offering a joyful and Gospel-focused witness to a lost and needy world.
David S. Dockery, chairman; president, Union University, Jackson, Tennessee

Truth, Trust, and Testimony provides a unified witness across the spectrum of Southern Baptist life that we hold much in common concerning what we believe and how we should live. We do have differences that are significant but they are not so great as to keep us from working side by side and hand in hand to fulfill the Great Commission and reach the nations with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. I believe this statement provides a way forward. It is time to unite behind King Jesus and take up the sword of an inerrant Bible and engage our real enemies of Satan, sin, death, and hell.
Danny Akin, president, Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, Wake Forest, North Carolina

I affirm the Calvinism Advisory Committee Statement for four reasons: 1) it strikes a good balance as a consensus statement; 2) it stakes out the ground where we can stand together on the issues; 3) it stipulates some of our key theological differences without being polemical; and 4) it steers a good course for continued future discussion.
David Allen, dean, School of Theology, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas

Southern Baptists are a doctrinally diverse group who, by God’s grace, agree on the essentials of the faith. As this consensus document affirms, we can no longer afford to allow our doctrinal differences to obscure our substantive and vital areas of agreement. It is my prayer that as we move forward we will do so joyfully acknowledging our unity in Christ and humbly engaging areas of doctrinal disagreements while focusing our energies and passion on spreading the glorious Gospel of our crucified and risen Lord to a lost and dying world.
Tom Ascol, pastor, Grace Baptist Church, Cape Coral, Florida

I am happy to support Christians laboring together for the Gospel. I’ve appreciated the leadership that Frank Page, David Dockery, Eric Hankins, Al Mohler, and others have given on encouraging cooperation for the Gospel in our discussions.
Mark Dever, senior pastor, Capitol Hill Baptist Church, Washington, DC

I affirm this statement, the conversation, and the men and women who participated in this process. May The Lord guide Southern Baptists to pursue biblical truth and the oneness that Jesus prayed for so the world may know Him (John 17:23).
Leo Endel, executive director, Minnesota-Wisconsin Baptist Convention, Rochester, Minnesota

It is an honor to be a member of the Calvinism Advisory Committee and I stand ready and willing to work for the advancement of the Gospel-centered principles outlined in our statement. I fully affirm every aspect of Truth, Trust, and Testimony in a Time of Tension. The statement reflects the kind of biblically informed wisdom needed for such a time as this. May our Lord Jesus Christ be pleased and glorified above all.
Ken Fentress, senior pastor, Montrose Baptist Church, Rockville, Maryland

I am pleased to endorse Truth, Trust, and Testimony in a Time of Tension. It is a very good effort and I trust will contribute to a way forward that honors Jesus Christ. This document is a model of charitable truth-telling among convictional Baptists over issues that have long roiled Bible-believing Christians. May God use this document to move us closer to Christ and closer to one another—to the end that God will be glorified in ever-increasing measure.
Timothy George, dean, Beeson Divinity School of Samford University, Birmingham, Alabama

I am excited and honored to present Southern Baptists with a consensus statement driven by the things we hold so dear: the Word, the Spirit, mission, cooperation, and freedom. I believe it effectively articulates and models the way forward, taking seriously both our theological unity and diversity as a truly positive component of our “one sacred effort.”
Eric Hankins, senior pastor, First Baptist Church, Oxford, Mississippi

I am totally satisfied with the fairness of this document, which does a magnificent job of articulating our shared belief. I wholeheartedly add my full support to this document. I am grateful to each person that has worked so hard to help us speak with Christ-honoring clarity.
Johnny Hunt, pastor, First Baptist Church, Woodstock, Georgia

I am totally supportive of the statement. I believe history teaches us there is room for various shades of thought on this topic. I’m praying we will joyfully coexist and the Gospel will go forth in greater power because of our unity!
David Landrith, senior pastor, Long Hollow Baptist Church, Hendersonville, Tennessee

Prior to our first meeting, I sought input from a variety of lay people as to what they felt our focus should be on an obviously hot topic. Top on the list was an appeal for civility—pleading that we simply learn how to engage the issue of Calvinism respectfully and stop the name calling and rude behavior. I was thrilled that so much of our discussion addressed this problem and bore fruit as our respect grew for one another. Secondly, our appeal for honesty regarding doctrinal convictions on the part of candidates interviewing with churches is, in my mind, the key to solving deep divisions that have arisen in churches that feel betrayed. Churches and ministerial candidates must show integrity in the search process as to who they are and what they believe. I pray Southern Baptists will do three things: stop talking so much about that which they have overheard but not personally studied or verified; actually read our report before judging it; and show up in Houston to witness during Crossover block parties where we demonstrate what we claim to be our priority of pleading with sinners to believe in Christ, confessing to others that “our Lord is mighty to save and that He saves to the uttermost.”
Tammi Ledbetter, homemaker and journalist; member Inglewood Baptist Church, Grand Prairie, Texas

For Christians to work together cooperatively requires broad doctrinal agreement, although not agreement in every point of detail. This statement underlines the broad areas of doctrine upon which the overwhelming majority of us as Southern Baptists agree. It outlines the basis on which we can continue working together cooperatively and constructively for the cause of Christ.
Steve Lemke, provost and director of the Baptist Center for Theology and Ministry, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, New Orleans, Louisiana

As SBC President I want to thank our chief encouraging officer Dr. Frank Page for his efforts in calling together and meeting with the Calvinism Advisory Group. This group had the difficult task of dealing with a subject that many Southern Baptists have very strong opinions about. My personal prayer is that this report will be an example of how believers can come together to impact the Kingdom of God and not personal agendas.
Fred Luter, president of the Southern Baptist Convention; senior pastor, Franklin Avenue Baptist Church, New Orleans, Louisiana

There is little that I will sign in the way of corporate statements. My love for the unity in essentials among Southern Baptists for the purpose of getting the Gospel to every human on earth has wrung my signature on this document from my heart. The most important aspect to me is the provision for honesty and integrity for all. God grant that it be so.
Paige Patterson, president, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas

This statement speaks volumes about the ability of all Southern Baptists of good faith and good will to work together eagerly and enthusiastically. As the statement affirms, these tensions have been present within the Southern Baptist Convention from the very beginning of our life and work together. We are people who take theology seriously. But we are also people who take seriously our joy and privilege in working together in service to the Great Commission. We also made a bold statement of support for and agreement in The Baptist Faith and Message. We are a confessional people, gladly affirming together the faith once for all delivered to the saints. I am thankful for every member of this task force and for the privilege of working together in this process and on this historic and timely statement.
R. Albert Mohler Jr., president, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Louisville, Kentucky

I enthusiastically affirm the statement of our committee. While it candidly acknowledges differences Southern Baptists have, it’s a powerful reminder that we stand together on essential doctrines such as the inerrancy of Scripture, the free offer of salvation through Jesus Christ alone, and the universal sufficiency of Christ’s work on the cross. I’m thankful that the statement encourages all Southern Baptists—wherever we may stand with respect to Calvinism—to be gracious and constructive as we serve the Lord together.
Stephen Rummage, senior pastor, Bell Shoals Baptist Church, Brandon, Florida

I am in full agreement with the Truth, Trust, and Testimony document. It is the product of a very candid yet respectful dialogue regarding theological issues, attitudes, and practices. While it is understandable that each side would prefer stronger support for its views, the fact is that this document establishes fair parameters for understanding and collaboration and is unequivocal regarding its affirmation of The Baptist Faith and Message and its commitment to the Great Commission. My prayer is that this document will pave the way for all Southern Baptists to make an even stronger commitment to win North America and the rest of the world for Christ.
Daniel Sanchez, associate dean, professor of missions, and director of the Scarborough Institute of Church Planting & Growth, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas

I gratefully and gladly affirm this fine statement because it focuses our unity in the Gospel, in our Baptist heritage, in The Baptist Faith and Message, and in the Great Commission of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Jimmy Scroggins, senior pastor, First Baptist Church, West Palm Beach, Florida

23 responses to “TRUTH, TRUST, and TESTIMONY in a TIME of TENSION

    • I detected certain biases in that article as well as graciousness. I wouldn’t consider those who would try Calvinistic ‘covert’ operations true and genuine Calvinists, having studied the man and his “Institutes’ quite extensively. He does seem to contradict you on several of your main points concerning SBs and Calivnism, as does this particular blog post. Are the SB types who would consider themselves Calvinists ‘fake’ SBs? After all, you have said several times that SBs don’t believe in Calvinism, and you speak TRUTH, according to you.


      • Oh, but he doesn’t contradict this:
        “Having written on the subject the best thing I have been called in reactionary emails is sub-human. Bigoted, ignorant, untruthful, unlearned, and some not as nice terms have been in email messages. They have written long messages filled with numerous questions to which they demand answers. Failure to respond in detail is reason to be branded unenlightened. Some of their smarmy comments are degrading. They can’t be convicted of being laconic. Any attempt to respond lovingly and logically is met with a paroxysm. Efforts to be personally gracious result in a vitriolic cudgel.”

        And, it also confirms what I was talking about in regards to “covert”, and everything that he wrote about the covert operations of the leaders to the congregation. Deception and lies.

        This is confirmation of what I was discussing in the last blog post, for which you just ignore as being a good thing, not a bad thing. But, I can assure you that deception is a bad thing. Lying is equated to deception and it is a sin to lie, it is a sin to be deceptive.

        On another blog post, Southern Baptists that are the congregation (NOT leaders) do not hold your beliefs that this is a good thing.

        Do me a favor, and log onto Do a word search in the KJV for “trouble you”. That is what the Calvinists are doing to the Southern Baptists. Instead of concentrating on what the leaders of both sides are saying, and/or doing, consider the congregants. Some think that Calvinism is repulsive.



        • Actually Ed, I am fascinated by the history of the church, the good, the bad, and the ugly. Some call it broadening the mind. You seem to only be interested in whatever ‘truth’ you are shouting from the rooftops at any given moment. That is evidenced by you posting as a ‘great read’ an article from someone who actually would contadict you on many points because he sees ‘covert’ operations, as you do.


    • Some to the extent that they ignore irrefutable facts. I have to wonder if, in some of those instances, the passage that tells us ‘the God of this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers’.


      • And what you are concluding is this:

        Those who do not believe in Calvinism are non-believers that the devil has blinded.

        I say that Calvinism is of the devil, and that the devil has blinded Calvinists.



        • Actually, Ed, I was referring to a few previously made comments that declared that Southern Baptists don’t subscribe to Calvinist doctrine… spite of irrefutable facts……such as the Calvinism Advisory Committee report. A person would need to be blind to declare such nonsense that there aren’t any SB Calivnists. In fact, you have made the ridiculous assertion several times in the face of ‘irrefutable facts’. Perhaps you just forgot to acknowledge your error, or had ‘grammar’ issues and didn’t really intend to say such a silly thing.


          • What you referenced, however, is this, without writing it down:

            2 Corinthians 4:3-5 King James Version (KJV) 3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: 4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. 5 For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus’ sake.

            Lost people are not saved, hence, unbelievers.  Therefore, you conclude that those who do not believe in Calvinism are unbelievers.  I stand by what I said.  Your clarification changes nothing.  Besides, your facts are refutable, which is why there is a debate to begin with.



            • Actually Ed, the words ” I have to wonder if, in some of those instances, the passage that tells us ‘the God of this world has blinded the minds of unbelievers’.” do not conclude anything. I merely said that there was something that caused me to wonder IF something might be true. Only God knows with certainty who is/is not a benuine believer. I hesisate to make that judgment, even when hallmarks of un-belief are present.


              • And I am the one who said he was wondering IF something might be true, but offered NO personal conclusion.

                At the same time, if I research what can be called the ‘necessary’ things commonly held to be ‘core’ beliefs of Christianity, and I meet someone who denies some of those things, I still refrain from passing judgment. If I see ‘stinking fruit’ I still refrain from making judgment calls, however I might modify my behavior toward those who appear not to be genuine believers.
                Whether a person is a genuine Christian or not depends on that person’s belief in Christ, NOT what particular theological persuasion he/she might be called. Therefore I affirm that some non-Calvinists are Christians, and some probably aren’t. The same can be said of people belonging to a wide assortment of theological ‘groups.

                If you want a YES/NO answer, you are not going to get one from me. To answer with a blanket yes or no would be foolish, if not monumentally stupid of me.


              • You said: “Therefore I affirm that some non-Calvinists are Christians”.

                That’s all I needed to hear.  And if that be the case, then there is no need to preach Calvinism to non-Calvinists.  Just preach Jesus, without Calvins thoughts, or teachings.  Let people make up their own minds based on Bible alone, without a formal pre-written “confession” that was decided by someone other than the person who is confessing, i.e., the “we believe” statements.  The only confession that the Bible alone states is this:

                Matthew 10:32 Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.

                Romans 10:9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

                Romans 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

                Philippians 2:11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

                1 John 1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

                1 John 4:15 Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.

                What?  No confession of “doctrines”? 

                NOTE:  Confession comes from the heart, out of the mouth.  No need for a pre-written by someone else dead guy recitation of “We Believe” statements of things outside of what is listed herein.



              • Some of us just want the WHOLE counsel of God, which contains such terms as election and predestination, from the lips of the apostle Paul. Calvin appeared a bit later. The Bible teaches the Sovereignty of God in salvation as well as the responsibility of men to believe. That’s what I know. I am really tired of being told that sovereign grace is something John Calvin invented. I take my cue from Paul, who preached Christ and Him crucified for the sins of men. I don’t preach Calvinism and I don’t know anyone who does. I know others who believe in sovereign grace.


              • You have your take on predestination/election, which differs from non-Calvinists, and we both confirm that the words are in the Bible.

                What we disagree on, is how those terms are used, and meant. 

                We both have differing views on the Sovereignty of God.  We both have differing views on salvation.  But we both believe the Apostle Paul.  We both believe in the accuracy of the Bible.  But we don’t agree as to the interpretation. 

                I find it very interesting that the Calvinists generally have no desire to find out WHY we believe what we believe.  We do our homework to find out why you believe in Calvinism.  And we firmly reject it.  We can provide scripture to back up our position.  Your side will generally dismiss our scripture references as being heretical, calling us all sorts of nasty names…all the while saying that you will “pray” for us.  Rigggghhhhht.  Like I believe that one…not!!!

                I firmly believe that if you give a person FREEDOM to come to his or her own conclusions, based on their own study, as a Berean, then it is between them, and God.  Man has no right to interfere in anyone’s beliefs.  The confessions in the Bible is sufficient.  No other confessions are warranted.  God isn’t asking or telling us to conform to additional confessions.  That is a man made requirement.  And it is a requirement in your circles.  It’s like being a Pharisee…adding things to the checklist that God never commanded.   



              • “I find it very interesting that the Calvinists generally have no desire to find out WHY we believe what we believe. We do our homework to find out why you believe in Calvinism. And we firmly reject it. We can provide scripture to back up our position. Your side will generally dismiss our scripture references as being heretical, calling us all sorts of nasty names…all the while saying that you will “pray” for us. Rigggghhhhht. Like I believe that one…not!!!”

                That comment is one reason it seems rather unprofitable to try engage you in meaningful dialogue.You make another hasty generalization about Calvinists (I have not claimed to be one anyway) that you cannot possibly substantiate, then claim to do what you claim they don’t do, that you cannot know the do/don’t do.

                I also realize this quite a late response to your comment. I just fund a bucket load of comments I missed that were in moderation. I sent several to the round file in the corner. I just didn’t feel like trying to discuss the same old things with you again.
                That comment is one reason it seems rather unprofitable to try engage you in meaningful dialogue.


  1. Ed said:
    “You have your take on predestination/election, which differs from non-Calvinists, and we both confirm that the words are in the Bible.

    What we disagree on, is how those terms are used, and meant.

    We both have differing views on the Sovereignty of God. We both have differing views on salvation. But we both believe the Apostle Paul. We both believe in the accuracy of the Bible. But we don’t agree as to the interpretation.

    I find it very interesting that the Calvinists generally have no desire to find out WHY we believe what we believe. We do our homework to find out why you believe in Calvinism. And we firmly reject it. We can provide scripture to back up our position. Your side will generally dismiss our scripture references as being heretical, calling us all sorts of nasty names…all the while saying that you will “pray” for us. Rigggghhhhht. Like I believe that one…not!!!

    I firmly believe that if you give a person FREEDOM to come to his or her own conclusions, based on their own study, as a Berean, then it is between them, and God. Man has no right to interfere in anyone’s beliefs. The confessions in the Bible is sufficient. No other confessions are warranted. God isn’t asking or telling us to conform to additional confessions. That is a man made requirement. And it is a requirement in your circles. It’s like being a Pharisee…adding things to the checklist that God never commanded.”

    You began by stating the obvious, Ed. We disagree on some things. To each his own. Your argument begins to head south again when you hit me with another generalization about “Calvinists” that has no ground in reality.

    People are free to believe whatever they want; I’m not telling anyone what to believe. I’m just trying to have an intelligent discussion.

    Concerning the confessions of the church – that’s another very interesting topic for study. It goes to why we believe what we believe, something you say ‘Calvinists’ don’t care about.


    • Are they really free?  Name calling is not exactly indicating that one condones being free.  Actions, such as Calvin and Luther proves that one is not free to believe what they want.  Randy indicates that those who do not believe as he as those who are ignorant, and he wishes that ignorance was painful.  A few hundred years ago, he would have his wish come true.  He is in the wrong generation.  He hates the English language being butchered, but he wouldn’t mind having non-Calvinists butchered.  So, when you say that people are free to believe what they want, I am not so sure as to what that means from a Calvinist point of view.  I don’t see much freedom within your belief system.  I see domination, I see abuse.  Hence, Julie Anne’s Blog.  And many people are coming out of your belief system, as victims of abuse, based on domination, and fear, and NO FREEDOM of thought.  Take for example this homeschooling issue, courting, instead of dating, girls not allowed to do certain things, kids must live with parents until married off, etc., etc.  It’s all BONDAGE stuff, and there is NO FREEDOM in that.  So to say that people are free to believe what they want, in reality, it comes with negative consequences from the Calvinists.  It’s not freedom.



      • “So, when you say that people are free to believe what they want, I am not so sure as to what that means from a Calvinist point of view.”

        It means exactly what it SAYS, irrespective of any ‘point of view’. It means that unless you can somehow read thoughts and punish me for them, perform brain surgery, or hit me over the head with a baseball bat, there is NO WAY you can restrict what I think.

        I have nothing to say to what came before that little comment or what followed it. It really makes little if no sense at all. You did however telegraph a bit of hypocrisy in saying the name calling restricts freedom of thought. You are all about freedom of thought and at the same time engage in name-calling. Not that name-calling can restrict thought in the first place.


        • Uhmmmm…In Christianity, belief comes with “confession”, as you well know.  Therefore, what people think is expressed thru their mouth.  So, I am not buying into your explanation. 

          In regards to name calling, mine is all in fun and jest, my sarcastic personality.  Calvinists are SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK to the point that anger swells up in their veins.  Tell me that isn’t true? 

          There is no hipocracy from me.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s