"What are Pelagianism and Semi-Pelagianism?"

Who cares and why does it matter?

I’m glad you asked that question. If you attend many of today’s evangelical churches days, you might recognize either one, or both of those concepts of the ‘natural’ human condition being presented as the truth. We report, you decide.

Answer: Pelagius was a monk who lived in the late 300s and early 400s A.D. Pelagius taught that human beings were born innocent, without the stain of original or inherited sin. He believed that God created every human soul directly and therefore every human soul was originally free from sin. Pelagius believed that Adam’s sin did not affect future generations of humanity. This view became known as Pelagianism.

Pelagianism contradicts many Scriptures and scriptural principles. First, the Bible tells us that we are sinful from the moment of conception (Psalm 51:5). Further, the Bible teaches that all human beings die as a result of sin (Ezekiel 18:20; Romans 6:23). While Pelagianism says that human beings are not born with a natural inclination towards sin, the Bible says the opposite (Romans 3:10-18). Romans 5:12 clearly states that Adam’s sin is the reason sin infects the rest of humanity. Anyone who has raised children can attest to the fact that infants must be taught to behave; they do not have to be taught how to sin. Pelagianism, therefore, is clearly unscriptural and should be rejected.

Semi-Pelagianism essentially teaches that humanity is tainted by sin, but not to the extent that we cannot cooperate with God’s grace on our own. Semi-Pelagianism is, in essence, partial depravity as opposed to total depravity. The same Scripture passages that refute Pelagianism will also refute Semi-Pelagianism. Romans 3:10-18 definitely does not describe humanity as only being partially tainted by sin. The Bible clearly teaches that without God “drawing” us, we are incapable of cooperating with God’s grace. “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him” (John 6:44). Like Pelagianism, Semi-Pelagianism is unbiblical and should be rejected.

NOTE 1: the above brief definitions of Pelagianism and semi-Pelagianism were found online at the GotQuestions? website. There are other, more detailed definitions out there. If this short post piqued your interest, go for it.The recommended source for the information was taken from The Moody Handbook of Theology by Paul Enns.

NOTE 2: The above citation from John 6:44 is the first half of the complete passage which reads “No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up at the last day.” Sinners come to Christ and He raises them up. I know ‘arguing from silence’ never proves a point, but the fact that there is no ‘if’, between ‘coming’ and being ‘raised up’, might have something to say about the eternal security of the believer. But that’s another discussion entirely.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s