For SERIOUS Students of Scripture ONLY

This is a very short study of Acts 13:48 designed to encourage/elicit a serious look at a particular scripture that most probably will never be heard from the pulpits stages of a large number of churches across America in these times of ‘Christianity light’ – thus the title.  If the short study below and the much longer study (referenced by a link after it) accurately reflect what inspired Scripture actually teaches, it could be a shock to the belief system of all those who hold the notion that Christ died to make salvation ‘possible’ and not actually ‘secure’ salvation for anyone. I call that the “God sent His own Son to die for what MIGHT be” theory of the atonement. I have included seven renderings of Acts 13:48, as well as citations from a few commentaries, that should pique the interest of even those who despise the doctrine of election.

So please read on, study further (or don’t), comment (or don’t), and be challenged. Above all, be blessed by God through His inspired written word.

“And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.” – ESV

“When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed.” NIV

“Now when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and glorified the word of the Lord. And as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed.” NKJV

“When the Gentiles heard this, they began to rejoice and praise the word of the Lord, and all who had been appointed for eternal life believed.” NET Bible

“When the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord; and as many as had been appointed to eternal life believed.” NASB

“When the Gentiles heard this, they were very glad and thanked the Lord for his message; and all who were chosen for eternal life became believers. NLT

“When the non-Jewish outsiders heard this, they could hardly believe their good fortune. All who were marked out for real life put their trust in God—they honored God’s Word by receiving that life.” MSG

COMMENTARY ENTRIES:

Do not “tone down” the phrase in v. 48 that indicates that certain people were “ordained to eternal life.” The Gk. word actually means “enrolled,” and has the idea of names written in a book. While salvation is by grace, through faith, there is also that mysterious working of God whereby we are “chosen in Christ” (Eph. 1:4). We do not know who God’s elect are, so we offer the Gospel to all and have confidence that the Spirit will work. – Wiersbe, Warren W.: Wiersbe’s Expository Outlines on the New Testament. Wheaton, Ill. : Victor Books, 1997, c1992, S. 312

and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed—a very remarkable statement, which cannot, without force, be interpreted of anything lower than this, that a divine ordination to eternal life is the cause, not the effect, of any man’s believing. – Jamieson, Robert ; Fausset, A. R. ; Fausset, A. R. ; Brown, David ; Brown, David: A Commentary, Critical and Explanatory, on the Old and New Testaments. Oak Harbor, WA : Logos Research Systems, Inc., 1997, S. Ac 13:48

The Gentiles rejoiced in this turn of events and all who were appointed for eternal life believed. It is difficult to miss the doctrine of God’s election here; the words “were appointed” come from the verb tassō, a military word meaning “to arrange” or “to assign.” Luke used it here to show that God’s elective decree included Gentiles.- Walvoord, John F. ; Zuck, Roy B. ; Dallas Theological Seminary: The Bible Knowledge Commentary : An Exposition of the Scriptures. Wheaton, IL : Victor Books, 1983-c1985, S. 2:390

EDITORIAL COMMENT TO THIS BLOG POST:

I was surprised that the Message had a decent rendering of the “appointed” concept, although “marked out for real life” somehow doesn’t carry the full impact of “appointed for eternal life”. “Real life” has too many temporal connotations and we are talking eternality, not our “best life NOW” in this passage.

There is a very extensive study of Acts 13:48 here.  It is actually in two parts, with a link to Part 2 at the end of Part 1. I found it after I posted my own short study above. It includes 25 translations of this verse spanning 400 years, discusses in depth the single translation in which the word “appointed” is rendered “were disposed to” (New World Translation [Jehovah’s Witnesses and on my shelf]), a possible but highly suspect translation.

It has been commented of late that I have a “fixation” on the doctrine of predestination. That might be true, and a good thing or a bad thing, depending on your connotation of “fixation”. If my “fixation” is ultimately on the sovereignty and glory of God, it just might be a good thing. The idea that when I was completely unable to seek God (Romans 3), He drew me and enabled me (John 6:44 & 65) to come to Christ, expresses a love that TOTALLY eclipses the “God sent His own Son to die for what MIGHT be” doctrine of the atonement mentioned at the top of this post.

A word of caution/disclaimer – the terms “Calvinism” and “Arminianism”, appear in the study’s text, however I am not setting you up to be ambushed by what I believe and hold dear, nor am I pulling some sort of theological/spiritual “bait and switch”. I am actually interested in serious study and comment/discussion.

8 responses to “For SERIOUS Students of Scripture ONLY

  1. I don’t think it can be any clearer than that. I do like the way Wiersbe put it (I LOVE Wiersbe):

    “We do not know who God’s elect are, so we offer the Gospel to all and have confidence that the Spirit will work.”

    Amen.

    I don’t really have any other input. I think this says it clearly, as do many other scriptures. We can trust in the One who called us from the foundation of the world to be found in Him. Eph. 1:6

    Good words, Dan. 😉

    Like

  2. That is a very good summary of a verse that is rarely looked at in this ongoing challenge.

    The lexical study on your citation was especially interesting for me, because once upon a time I did a word sutdy on Tassw (appoint) but more recently I did a word study on orizw (establish boundaries, limit, determine) or more commonly known proorizw (predeterminie all those things, the parrticiple for this is used in Ephesians 1:5, predestine.

    There is only one use of “predestine” which occurs before Paul, and its use is not at all applicable. So the 6 uses of proorizw in the NT define what the word means throughout Greek.

    I found that, in Ephesians 1:4, “election” parallels the circumstances and usage of the OT bahar or choose. (Deut 4:37, Deut 7:6-7.) And what followed was God’s description of what he sovereignly did to effect the destiny of the chosen. This is as close to the application of predestine as possible, because the word basically means to to establish boundaries upon a thing before the thing is available.

    That is, as “appoint” is used here, their election from eternity was appointed to happen here and now.

    Thanks for such thoroughness.

    Like

  3. Greetings, Jason! Thanks for stopping by and adding to the discussion. thanks for the connection between election/predestination and having been ‘appointed’!

    Sounds like you went to the longer study also. It seemed to be really thorough and objective and gave me some new insight. I really hope some folks will be encouraged to take a deeper look into scripture. Michelle presented a good information concerning the ‘soul’ and the ‘spirit’ at her place, prompted by a ‘spirited’ discussion at another blog site the had some interesting opinions on thos issues.

    Like

  4. The need of greater and greater articulation in Christian History have, to the best of my knowledge, always the result of people doing the best they can to circumnavigate what Scripture says plainfacedly.

    This is a quote from Hilary of Poitier (sp?) from his book on the trinity. I leave it places where I will find it from time to time.

    “The errors of heretics
    force us
    to deal with unlawful matters
    to seek perilous heights
    to speak unutterable words
    to trespass on forbidden ground
    compeling us to err
    in trying to embody
    in human terms

    truths

    which ought to be hidden
    in the silent veneration
    of the heart.”

    Like

  5. let my rephrase my completely unintelligable first sentence

    The need of greater and greater articulation…has always been the result of (and the necessary response to) people doing their best to circumnavigate that which Scripture plainfacedly states.

    much better

    Like

  6. Now that’s a ‘quotable quote’ and I will use it. It definitely speaks to the need to continually define terms that at some time in the past had commonly accepted definitions in Christendom. The term ‘gospel’ as defined by Paul in 1 Corinthians up against contemporary definitions might be a good example.

    Like

Leave a comment