Most professing Christians would agree that we are to share the good news of Christ (the gospel), using words, deeds or both. Most are also in agreement that the sharing of the gospel applies to individuals as well as the corporate church. Furthermore, ‘good deeds’ in the Name of Christ speak for themselves. When it comes to ‘words’ however, there is a lot of opinion out there regarding the correct approach and even the words we should/should not use approaching the subject with non-believers. We would all probably agree with the need to share the CORE of the gospel. Is it possible to define it?
We have heard it all. It’s about ‘having your best life now’, discovering God’s custom-made plan/purpose for your life, experiencing health/wealth & prosperity (abundant living), etc., and all because God loves us so much he can’t wait to make it all happen for us. These are things for which Christ died. One Sunday morning I heard that Christ died for my ‘dreams’. I have heard that God loves us so much He can’t even imagine His heaven without us. We package the presentation into neat little set of a few laws or canned verses designed to elicit certain responses followed by a self-evident decision. One set of study materials, with which I am very familiar, stated that the very core of Christianity, the reason Christ died on the cross was God’s passionate desire for a relationship with us. ‘Relationship’ with God through Christ is certainly inherent in God’s reconciling work – the very work that is passed to all believers, but is it the very center, the CORE of the gospel message?
This post isn’t about ‘pinging’ on all the promoters/proponents of all the ‘stuff’ we have heard, whether I mentioned it above or even if you have ‘filled in a blank’. I think it would do us well to define what the gospel IS, for two specific purposes: 1) to make sure we have the necessary ‘basic ingredients’ in our message and 2) so that we maintain the proper balance in our presentation of the gospel message. The higher goal is to be able to faithfully deliver His message to the praise of His glorious grace!
For a concise definition of the gospel we need look no further than the Apostle Paul and what he had to say on the matter. Although we could start with John 3:16, the odds on favorite, but I thought it wise to consult someone whose life work after meeting his Savior was exactly that – spreading the gospel and ‘growing’ the church. I chose Paul because although he possessed the equivalent of was several post-graduate degrees, he kept it simple. So let’s turn to Paul for a concise definition of the gospel:
“Now I want to make clear for you, brothers and sisters, the gospel that I preached to you, that you received and on which you stand, and by which you are being saved, if you hold firmly to the message I preached to you – unless you believed in vain. For I passed on to you as of first importance what I also received – that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he was raised on the third day according to the scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. 15:6 Then he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at one time…” – 1 Corinthians 15:1-5
This is not the first time Paul presented this message to the church at Corinth and before he re-delivers it he tells them that is ‘of first importance’, not second, third, or something to bring up a few months after a more ‘relevant’, ‘comfortable’, or non-threatening’ message to get folks through the church doors. What is of first importance are two last events that happened to Christ before His ascension to sit at the right hand of the Father.
- Christ died for our sins (according to the Scriptures), and was buried (validation – they didn’t bury dead folks).
-
He was raised on the third day (according to the Scriptures) and was seen by 500+ people (validation – too many for a conspiracy).
Each event was according to previously declared scripture and validated after the event’s occurrence.
Please don’t misunderstand me. I am NOT saying we shouldn’t include God’s awesome love, the promise of abundant life,or His plan for our lives. We just need to keep central what IS central and discuss all the rest using God’s definition and according to His terms, not ours.
If we want examples of evangelistic encounters we can start with the book of Acts. There are about nineteen of them and guess what? ‘God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life’ isn’t one of them. Should that tell us something?
In today’s world, when people no longer want to discuss sin, the gospel is irrelevant to them. Doesn’t mean we shouldn’t share it, for it is the most relevant teaching of all. But we think we’re ‘beyond’ it – and we certainly don’t want to offend anyone…
So we water down the gospel and assure anyone who has taken on the name ‘Christian’ that they are saved.
I’m wondering if we don’t need to begin with a healthy dose of the Law for people to see their sin – so they understand the need for a Savior.
LikeLike
Hi Michelle,
You’ve got a good point. If Christ’s death for our sin is the central point of the gospel, is a ‘gospel’ without the mention of sin a gospel at all? The greatest news of all is how God dealt with OUR sin. Sin is the issue. Consciousness of sin is critical to the gospel message, I would say.
And Romans 3:20 tells us that through the law we become conscious of sin!
LikeLike
Pingback: Born on ‘Death Row’ « The Battle Cry